I had a chance to watch the video of Dr. Berhanu Nega's town hall meeting in
Stockholm, Sweden. Most of the town hall meeting focused on the election process rather than specific policies.
My summary of Dr. Berhanu's observations on the election process
In the beginning, the EPRDF government was committed to holding a fraud-free election. This was not because the government was necessarily committed to a democratic process but rather it wanted to legitimize its rule through a formal election. This would enable the government to secure the aid and loans it needs (67% of the Ethiopian GDP). The government chose this particular time in the belief that there would be no one to mount a serious challenge to its rule. This was not unreasonable expectation given that there were no parties that were well organized. This belief was shared by independent observers as well as the opposition leaders themselves.
The opposition parties, however, planned to use this unique opportunity in the country's history to kick start a democratic political culture. Utilizing the Public Relations (PR) and organizational skills obtained in diaspora, CUD especially was able to mobilize thousands of people from both the urban and the rural areas. Thousands of people were routinely coming out to rallies to show their support to CUD. This development made the EPRDF government disconcerted. EPRDF, therefore, had to scramble to organize some sort of a counter campaign to offset the popularity that the oppositions were gaining. Not being able to win the PR battle, EPRDF was forced to resort to intimidation of opposition supporters through arrests and threats.
The first public debate that was held between the government and the oppositions which focused mainly on the land holding policy showed that the opposition would be able to stand toe to toe with the EPRDF government. The EPRDF government failed to defend its position convincingly. This fact coupled with the CUD manifesto helped to shatter the myth that the opposition would not be able to challenge the government on policy related issues. The culminating fact that demonstrated the fact that Ethiopian people were truly tired of the rule of the EPRDF regime was the famous rally held in Addis. Millions came to show their support to the opposition. This fact later translated to a complete drubbing of EPRDF in Addis during the election. One curious fact was that although EPRDF claimed to have 200,000 registered party members in Addis, the total number of votes it received was only 150,000.
A day after the election, the EPRDF government came out and declared itself as the winner. CUD president, Hailu Shawel, then responded by rejecting the election. This was a premature statement by both parties as the tallying of votes was not completed. AAU students who suspected of the government of planning to steal the election conducted a peaceful demonstration breaking the ban on demonstrations. This was later followed by taxi strikes and protests by other citizens. This led to the massacre of three dozen protesters by the EPRDF security forces.
Dr. Berhanu does believe in exploring all the avenues available to CUD before holding any sort of acts that would give the EPRDF government the justification to kill and torture Ethiopians. He believes that as long as the investigation is conducted in a transparent manner, EPRDF can not rig the election easily. He is a strong advocate of non-violence struggle.
On a personal level, I found that he was also extremely humorous and a great communicator. It is refreshing to listen to a voice of reason among all the hate being preached. I found his pragmatic and intelligent approach to the Ethiopian politics as ground breaking. I do not remember another Ethiopian leader who spoke with the same sort of reasonable and moderate tone. This is what Ethiopia needs not more intransigent groups. Indeed, he had demonstrated that he could be a worthy leader of Ethiopia.
The only discontent I had was the fact that CUD failed to strongly campaign in the Oromia region (by Dr. Berhanu's own admission). Although UEDF did well in Oromia, CUD should have demonstrated its commitment to the people of Oromia by spreading its message. This fact would also help to deconstruct the dangerous myth that CUD is an "Amhara/Gurage" party. Further more, CUD should also try extra-hard to include the people of Tigray who may feel ostracized by the rest of Ethiopians.
http://www.kestedemena.org (CUD's kestedemena/"Qinijit")
http://www.kestedemena.org/documents/cudmanifesto.pdf (CUD's manifesto)
BBC Hard Talk (H. Shawel) - Video
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/05/hardtalk/shawel05jul.ram
BBC Hard Talk (M. Zenawi) - Video
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/05/hardtalk/zenawi04jul.ram
Dr. Berhanu Nega (Stockholm) - Video
http://www.ethiopia.se/drberehanu.ram
Dr. Berhanu Nega (Brussels) - Audio
http://www.ethioindex.com/drberhanunegaeu.wma